ShareThis Page
Race for 3rd Fayette commissioner’s seat down to 44 ballots |

Race for 3rd Fayette commissioner’s seat down to 44 ballots

The race for the third commissioner seat in Fayette County is down to 44 ballots that won’t be counted for at least another week.

Incumbent Republican Angela Zimmerlink leads challenger Dave Lohr by 12 votes, according to unofficial results from the Nov. 8 election.

Yet to be counted are 31 absentee ballots and 13 provisional ballots. The 44 ballots were accepted by the election board during hearings that were held Friday and Wednesday, but they will not be counted until after the names of the absentee voters are released to allow for any challenges, said Larry Blosser, election bureau director.

The names will be released at 10 a.m. Monday. Anyone who wishes to challenge the absentee ballots will have until 2 p.m. Dec. 1 to do so, according to a motion passed yesterday by the board. In the event any of the ballots are challenged, the election board will meet at 10 a.m. Dec. 5 to consider the challenges.

Blosser said although any unchallenged absentee ballots will be opened at 2 p.m. Dec. 1, he does not plan to count them or the provisionals until after the challenge period expires.

Among the 31 absentee ballots that the board accepted yesterday were 10 that were postmarked by the Nov. 4 deadline, but sat at the Uniontown Post Office until past the deadline. Blosser said they were received by the election bureau on Nov. 8.

The board voted to accept the ballots even though they weren’t in the election bureau’s possession on Nov. 4 because they were postmarked by the deadline and were at the Uniontown post office. Mark Mehalov, board member, noted that for the week prior to the election, the bureau receives its mail at that post office.

For the same reason, the board accepted six absentee ballots that were postmarked Nov. 3, but not received by the election bureau until either Nov. 7 or Nov. 8. Sheryl Heid, solicitor for the election board, said it could not be determined whether the ballots were received on the 7th or the 8th.

Of the remaining absentee ballots, the board took no action on some, but rejected others. Of those that were rejected, most were postmarked after Nov. 4. Of the others, 10 were not signed by the voters or had illegible postmarks.

In addition to the absentee ballots, the board reviewed seven provisional ballots, accepting all but one. It had previously accepted seven of a total of 16 provisional ballots that were cast on Election Day, bringing the total to 13.

Provisional ballots are given to voters who are not listed on a precinct’s voter roster because they might have moved, gotten married and forgotten to change their last name, or they appeared at the wrong precinct.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.