ShareThis Page
Rankin Bridge opening ends Kennywood traffic headaches |

Rankin Bridge opening ends Kennywood traffic headaches

With the Rankin Bridge completed, there will be no more traffic headaches or detours for those heading to Kennywood.

‘We are very excited about how much easier it`s going to be for our guests to get to and from Kennywood,’ said Jeff Filicko, spokesman for the West Mifflin amusement park set to open this Saturday.

Though Kennywood representatives posted alternative routes to get around the bridge work the past two seasons, traffic jams on Route 837 were common during the park`s opening and closing times.

The increased traffic was worst when the underpass on the Whitaker side of the Rankin Bridge was closed and all traffic going towards the Steel Valley area was detoured through the juncture of the bridge and Route 837.

‘It was a project that desperately needed to be done,’ Filicko said.

He said any problem guests had getting to Kennywood the past two seasons should be eliminated.

The $48 million Rankin Bridge rehabilitation was officially completed on April 11.

‘The overall project is done,’ said Doug Aiken, manager of Allegheny County Public Works Construction Division.

‘There will be no more lane restrictions as a result of the project.’

He said crews are removing construction materials now.

The project began with prep work in June 2008. Rehabilitation work and major traffic restrictions began in January 2009.

Rehabilitation work by contractor Michael Baker Jr. Corp. included widening lanes, installing new lighting and traffic lights, and creating a new sidewalk.

‘The project went well,’ Aiken said. ‘We had a good contractor. It was a big disruption of traffic.

‘I think the final project was worth the two years it took to get a full rehabilitation.’

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.