Archive

ShareThis Page
Rape, 3 other charges dropped against Saltsburg teacher | TribLIVE.com
News

Rape, 3 other charges dropped against Saltsburg teacher

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 13, 2013 2:12 p.m
gtrsexteach110113
Renatta Signorini | Trib Total Media
Todd D. McCullough, 28, of Kiski Township, a Blairsville-Saltsburg High School teacher, was arrested Oct. 31, 2013, for the alleged rape of a 16-year-old 10th-grader in a private room at the school.

A Saltsburg High School student said she told only her best friend that a shop teacher had sex with her in school in the spring of 2012.

But when police learned of the alleged assault and met with the girl last month, she decided to tell investigators.

“I have a little sister … and I didn’t want him anywhere near her,” the girl testified Wednesday during a preliminary hearing for Todd Devin McCullough, 28, of Kiski Township in Armstrong County.

District Judge Jennifer Rega ruled that prosecutors presented no evidence indicating the alleged sexual contact was forced. She dismissed four charges — rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, aggravated indecent assault and indecent assault.

McCullough, a former shop teacher at Saltsburg Middle/High School, was ordered to stand trial on nine counts — sexual assault, intercourse with a student, aggravated indecent assault without consent, corruption of minors, indecent assault without consent, indecent exposure, harassment, disorderly conduct and open lewdness.

The girl testified that sometime in April 2012, when she was a sophomore, McCullough asked to see her breasts. She refused. He later led her into a secluded room off his classroom, where he exposed himself, she said.

“He asked me to follow him, so I did,” the girl testified.

She said she avoided McCullough’s classroom afterward until he called her to his room. She did not have a class with McCullough at the time.

“He was very apologetic, he knew what he did was wrong, and he said he was sorry,” she testified.

While she was in his classroom several days later, McCullough allegedly asked her back into the secluded room and they had sex.

“I wasn’t fighting back or anything,” she testified. “He didn’t force me, he picked me up and put me on the table.”

The girl said she denied any involvement with McCullough to administrators.

When other girls recently reported to the district allegedly unwanted contact with McCullough, state police were led to the girl who had the April 2012 encounter. The Tribune-Review does not identify alleged victims in sexual assault investigations.

“I was just scared because I knew that it would lead to this,” the girl testified. “I didn’t want this to interfere with my life.”

Under cross-examination, the girl said she was frightened during the alleged sexual assault, but she didn’t tell McCullough to stop.

“So you just let him pull your pants down?” asked defense attorney Duke George.

“Yes, I did,” the girl answered.

Later, George denied his client had sex with the girl, who was “infatuated” with McCullough.

“There’s no rape here. This girl had every opportunity to leave. This girl had every opportunity to scream out,” George argued. “This was a situation where she was 16, and it was consensual.”

District Attorney Patrick Dougherty said McCullough was an authority figure who committed a crime.

“She didn’t want to have sex with this man,” Dougherty argued.

Police are investigating claims other female students have made against McCullough. He was suspended without pay by the district when the accusations surfaced last month. He was arrested on Oct. 31 during an administrative meeting at the school.

Rega altered McCullough’s $150,000 cash bail to allow him to post a percentage bond. He was still in the county jail early Wednesday evening.

Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or rsignorini@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.