ShareThis Page
Rapist sentenced to up to 15 years in Fayette |

Rapist sentenced to up to 15 years in Fayette

Chuck Brittain
| Saturday, June 11, 2011 12:00 a.m

A Fayette County judge on Friday sentenced a man convicted of raping a woman in his home to serve up to 15 years in prison.

Judge Nancy Vernon ordered Barry L. “Bear” Smith Jr., 29, of 437 Route 31, South Huntingdon, formerly of Belle Vernon, to serve 7 1/2 to 15 years in jail for raping a 34-year-old woman in 2009.

Smith was convicted in March of holding the woman against her will in his home and sexually and physically assaulting her.

Smith is awaiting trial in Westmoreland County on a similar case.

Smith was convicted of rape, aggravated indecent assault, aggravated assault, sexual assault, indecent assault, recklessly endangering another person, false imprisonment and stalking.

In the Westmoreland case, Smith allegedly raped a 22-year-old woman who told police a friend was supposed to pick her up in California Borough and give her a ride to Charleroi that morning. She said Smith, whom she previously had met twice, showed up instead.

When they got to Smith’s house, he allegedly sexually assaulted her.

During yesterday’s sentencing hearing, Fayette Assistant Public Defender Mike Garofalo argued for a more lenient sentence, citing the state Sexual Offenders Assessment Board’s determination that Smith is not a sexual predator.

Vernon told Smith that he is “in need of correctional rehabilitation.” She said the prison term is within state sentencing guidelines.

After the sentence was read, Smith told Vernon, “I want to fire my attorney. I wanted to fire him before the trial.”

Vernon told Smith that was a legal issue he needs to address later.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.