Raucous crowd packs meeting to back Ford City police force |

Raucous crowd packs meeting to back Ford City police force

Ford City residents spoke in favor of keeping the borough’s police force at a Monday town hall meeting that included enough drama to bring one attendee to comment upon leaving that it was “better than a Broadway play.”

The 2 12-hour meeting about the fate of the borough’s police department drew about 150 to the Ford City High School auditorium.

In July, the borough’s police committee, made up of council members Vicki Schaub, Jerry Miklos and Scott Gaiser, suggested the department be disbanded.

“The purpose of this meeting is to present you with facts so you can make an informed decision,” said borough Manager Eden Ratliff.

He gave a presentation that covered topics including the borough’s largest expenses — police topped the list — median incomes in Ford City and nearby municipalities, and budgets of police departments in other Armstrong County communities.

The borough’s budget for this year is about $2.5 million; the police department budget accounts for about 20 percent of that ($515,000).

“Those of you who live here, own businesses and pay taxes here, we want to hear what you have to say,” Ratliff told the crowd.

And they obliged.

About 15 residents, ranging from teachers to bankers to retirees, took to the floor. All spoke in favor of the police. Some questioned figures presented by officials. Others expressed doubts over state police response times.

As he wrapped up his comments, resident Al Garay removed his prosthetic leg, thumped it against the lip of the auditorium’s stage and asked, “What am I supposed to protect myself with — this?”

Lorraine Helsh, a manager at Ford City’s Citizens Bank, said tellers are scared what might happen if the borough eliminated its police force.

“Police are the biggest deterrent,” she said. “We know how bad drugs are; we know what could happen.”

Several residents suggested they would pay higher taxes to keep the police department intact.

Homer Pendleton, a former councilman, said disbandment should be one of council’s “last options.”

“They ought to really sit down and try to work out something,” he said.

That did not seem likely at some points Monday.

Particularly not when Schaub slammed down the gavel and warned Miklos and Mayor Marc Mantini that if their bickering continued, the two borough police officers stationed at the auditorium’s entrance would remove them from the building.

Representatives of the Fraternal Order of Police, from local Lodge 39 and the state level, were among the few who did not have a chance to say their piece. They learned upon arriving at the meeting that only Ford City citizens and business owners were to be given the floor.

“But, the people spoke for themselves,” said Ted Meixelsberger of Lodge 39.

Julie Martin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1315 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.