Reconfigured Port Authority board elects new officers |

Reconfigured Port Authority board elects new officers

Port Authority of Allegheny County’s reconstituted board met Friday for the first time and elected Robert Hurley as chairman.

Hurley, 55, a Point Breeze Democrat and senior deputy director of the county’s Department of Economic Development, succeeds Jeff Letwin.

Tom Donatelli, 65, of McCandless was elected vice-chairman of the 11-member board; Connie Parker, 71, of Penn Hills and president of the Pittsburgh branch of the NAACP, was elected treasurer; and state Sen. Jim Brewster, 65, of McKeesport was elected secretary.

Hurley, a member of the old board, was reappointed by County Executive Rich Fitzgerald.

The vote in favor of the slate of candidates was 8-0.

Board member David White was absent and Allegheny County Councilwoman Amanda Green Hawkins did not arrive in time for the vote. Gov. Tom Corbett, who has one appointment, has not made his selection for the board.

Hurley said his first priority is to lobby the Legislature to pass a transportation bill with increased dedicated state funding. His second is to focus on the search for a CEO. The old board voted to fire former CEO Steve Bland on Feb. 1 at Fitzgerald’s urging. Hurley said the CEO search stalled after the Legislature in July passed a law changing how the board is appointed.

Hurley said there’s no conflict between serving on the board while working for Fitzgerald and the county in economic development.

“Quite frankly, what I do for the county goes in hand-in-glove with this. Businesses need transportation. It’s a regional issue,” Hurley said.

Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7886 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.