ShareThis Page
3 Steel Valley football camp organizers charged over hazing allegations |

3 Steel Valley football camp organizers charged over hazing allegations

Paul Peirce And Matthew Santoni
| Wednesday, August 2, 2017 11:03 a.m
Wikimedia Commons
Laurel Hill State Park
The Steel Valley Midget Football Association logo.
Wikimedia Commons
Laurel Hill State Park
The Steel Valley Midget Football Association logo.

Authorities in Somerset County say the Homestead-based Steel Valley Midget Football Association ran a football camp in Laurel Hill State Park last month that allowed and encouraged hazing and physical abuse.

Somerset District Attorney Lisa Lazzari-Strasiser said Camp Ruffhouse, which ran for 11- to 14-year-olds from July 7-12, first came to police attention when park visitors reported that a 12-year-old was being assaulted along a park road by two older campers. He told officers he was running away from the camp because of abuse from other players and “mistreatment” by coaches, Lazzari-Strasiser said.

Another player’s family contacted police after he came home from camp with a black eye and swollen lip, reporting that the younger boys were routinely hazed by the older ones.

“Both juveniles report that camp staffers were told about the chronic abuse. … But the problems were never addressed,” Lazzari-Strasiser said. “Rather, they report that campers who complained were called snitches, told by coaches to hit their aggressors back, and even punished by being made to run laps or stand in the middle of hitting drills.”

The District Attorney’s Office filed two counts each of endangering the welfare of children, a third-degree felony, against Steel Valley Midget Football Association Director Aaron Knight, Executive Director Loren Ford and camp director/leader Michael Todd.

The charges were filed Wednesday with District Judge Sandra Stevanus. Court documents showed Knight and Todd had been arraigned and released on $75,000 unsecured bonds, but Ford’s paperwork did not show his status as of Wednesday afternoon.

Angela Whitney, whose 13-year-old son, Trenton, attended the camp, was pleased authorities decided to pursue charges against the camp organizers after learning what her son and others endured.

“Those people should not be supervising anything with children. They went up there Friday, and I get a call Monday from one of the coaches that there was some back and forth between a couple of the boys and my son began walking back home,” Whitney said.

“He then told me everything was OK,” she said.

On the evening of July 11, Whitney received a second call from park rangers and Somerset children’s services.

“They said a motorist had come upon my son walking in the middle of the road near the park that day. My son explained that he had been beaten up by a couple of the older boys who had been told by the coaches up there to go out and find my son because he had run away,” Whitney said.

Whitney said her son told her that he had been vomiting for four days.

“I think he was sick from the anxiety as a result of the physical abuse he was taking from the other boys. But I should have been told,” Whitney said.

“I have five boys and I know what roughhousing is, but leaving boys those ages completely unsupervised, that’s what’s going to happen. … There was no organization at all,” she said.

Whitney said camp organizers told Trenton they had telephoned his mother about his concerns.

“They told him that I told them to tell Trenton to cry himself to sleep in his pillow … and if he didn’t behave, his father would beat his (expletive) when he got home,” Watkins said.

“I would never say that,” she added.

Watkins said Trenton had attended the camp the previous year with no such problems.

Another parent, Jennifer Wilson, was alarmed when her 11-year-old son, Jevon, returned home with a cut near his eye and “multiple bruises on his face, arms and lip.”

“I was never called … nothing whatsoever,” Wilson said.

“I paid good money for him to attend that camp, and he was supposed to be protected with adult supervision, but there was no supervision there. When I asked one of the organizers, he told me the kids who did that had to run laps,” she said.

“That is unacceptable for what happened to my son. Jevon was a very happy kid when he left for camp and I was a happy mother. … Now we both feel horrible over what happened,” Wilson said.

Both Whitney and Wilson said their children will no longer be associated with the midget football organization.

“I still think a lot of the parents don’t know what happened at the camp,” Wilson added.

The District Attorney’s Office noted that the football association wouldn’t give investigators a list of players, so investigators are asking anyone with information about who attended the camp to contact Laurel Hill State Park rangers at 814-445-7725 and ask for Officer Peck.

Park officials declined to comment, citing the ongoing investigation.

Attorney Lena Bryan-Henderson of Pittsburgh, who is representing both Knight and Todd, said her clients intend to fight the complaints and maintain they are innocent.

“Of course we intend to fight it. It’s the commonwealth’s obligation to prove these charges beyond a reasonable doubt. … There is a presumption of innocence here,” Henderson said.

She declined to comment further.

Paul Peirce and Matthew Santoni are Tribune-Review staff writers.

Categories: Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.