ShareThis Page
Fayette County woman jailed for exposing infant to fentanyl, troopers say |

Fayette County woman jailed for exposing infant to fentanyl, troopers say

Crystal Cumberland, 27, of North Union Township, Fayette County, faces criminal charges for exposing her infant to fentanyl in November. The 3-month-old had to be treated with Narcan at UPMC Children's Hospital in Pittsburgh.

The mother of a 3-month-old Fayette County infant who had to be airlifted to UPMC Children’s Hospital in Pittsburgh in November for treatment of a suspected opioid overdose now faces criminal charges.

Crystal D. Cumberland, 27, of North Union Township was arraigned Wednesday on aggravated assault, endangering the welfare of a child, simple assault and reckless endangerment and other charges, according to online court records.

According to an affidavit filed by Trooper Robert Wilson of Uniontown before District Judge Nathan Henning, paramedics were summoned to Cumberland’s residence on the 500 block of Independence Avenue for a report of a baby girl having trouble breathing at approximately 4:42 p.m. Nov. 13.

The infant was diagnosed as being “exposed to heroin or some other type of opioid” and flown to the Pittsburgh hospital, Wilson said in court documents.

At the hospital, Wilson said the infant was treated with several doses of Narcan, a drug that can reverse the effects of an opioid overdose.

“After obtaining a search warrant for the medical records, it was found that the infant was exposed to a near- fatal dose of fentanyl. The accused was found to have admitted to hospital staff to snorting a white powder to get high,” Wilson said.

Cumberland was ordered held in the Fayette County Jail after failing to post $25,000 bond.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.