ShareThis Page
Indiana County couple attack each other, blame it on robber, police say |

Indiana County couple attack each other, blame it on robber, police say

Jacob Tierney
| Thursday, November 2, 2017 5:47 a.m

An Indiana County woman told state police she and a man were attacked by home invaders, but police said the pair attacked each other during a domestic dispute.

Troopers were called Saturday night to the Maple Street home in White Township for a robbery.

Tonya Jean Hamilton, 43, told them the robber had stabbed Nathan Richard Deitman, 30, who also lives at the home, causing minor injuries.

Police said it was Hamilton who stabbed Deitman.

The pair had been arguing. During the fight, they hit each other. Police said Deitman choked Hamilton and that Hamilton stabbed Deitman.

Hamilton fled to a neighbor’s house and told the neighbor she had been attacked by a home invader, police said. The neighbor called 911.

Deitman is charged with strangulation, possession of a controlled substance, simple assault, resisting arrest, false reports to law enforcement and disorderly conduct.

Hamilton is charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, false reports to law enforcement and disorderly conduct.

Both are in the Indiana County Prison on $25,000 cash bail. A preliminary hearing before District Judge Susanne Steffee is scheduled for Nov. 13.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, or via Twitter .

Categories: Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.