ShareThis Page
Lamb leads Saccone in poll released on eve of special election |

Lamb leads Saccone in poll released on eve of special election

Tom Fontaine
| Monday, March 12, 2018 2:54 p.m
Republican state Rep. Rick Saccone and Democrat Conor Lamb, a former federal prosecutor, are running for Congress in a March 13 special election.

Conor Lamb will win Western Pennsylvania’s special election race for Congress on Tuesday if there is a surge in Democratic turnout similar to what has been seen in other special elections over the past year, according to a Monmouth University poll out Monday.

The Monmouth poll’s “Democratic surge” model shows Lamb collecting 51 percent of the vote compared with Saccone’s 45 percent, while 1 percent of likely voters would opt for a third-party candidate and 3 percent remain undecided. The poll’s margin of error is 5.1 percent.

Monmouth said Lamb holds a slim advantage within the margin of error, 49 percent to 47 percent, if the election has a lower turnout similar to what is normally seen in midterm elections. If turnout is higher across the board, similar to a presidential election year, Lamb would defeat Saccone, 51 percent to 44 percent.

Saccone held an advantage over Lamb in all three polling scenarios last month.

“This district has voted overwhelmingly Republican in recent elections, but a large number of these voters have blue-collar Democratic roots. Lamb seems to have connected with them,” said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.

“When added to a potential Democratic surge that has been building for weeks, Lamb appears to have picked off enough Republican-leaning voters to take a lead,” Murray said.

Monmouth said 95 percent of likely voters identifying themselves as Democrats support Lamb, while 88 percent of Republicans back Saccone. Independents favor Lamb, 51 percent to 45 percent.

The poll surveyed 372 voters by phone from March 8 to 11.

Lamb, 33, of Mt. Lebanon is a former Marine officer and federal prosecutor with bachelor’s and law degrees from the University of Pennsylvania. Saccone, 60, of Elizabeth Township is a fourth-term state representative and former Air Force counterintelligence officer with a Ph.D. in public and international affairs from the University of Pittsburgh.

They are vying to replace former GOP congressman Tim Murphy, who resigned in October amid an extramarital scandal. The congressional district includes parts of Allegheny, Westmoreland, Washington and Greene counties. Democrats outnumber Republicans by about 24,000 in the district, but Trump carried it by nearly 20 percentage points in 2016 and Murphy never had a race closer than 16 percentage points in his eight runs for Congress, including the past two elections in which he was unopposed.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review assistant news editor.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Tom at 412-320-7847, or via Twitter .

Categories: Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.