Archive

ShareThis Page
Masontown shooter had PFA, was allowed to keep gun | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Masontown shooter had PFA, was allowed to keep gun

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, September 20, 2018 8:06 p.m
253727GTRshooting5092018
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
State Police work at the scene of a shooting that occurred at the Masontown Borough's municipal building Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2018 in Fayette County.
253727GTRshooting52092018
State Police troopers are posted on the streets as investigators continue their work at the scene of a shooting that occurred at the Masontown Borough’s municipal building Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2018 in Fayette County.

After Patrick S. Dowdell of Masontown allegedly threatened his wife with a gun last month when she asked for a divorce, she asked a Fayette County judge for a protection from abuse order that would force her husband to give up his weapon.

Judge Joseph M. George Jr. issued the order, prohibiting Dowdell from going near his wife, but allowed him to keep his gun, according to court paperwork.

Dowdell, 62, of Masontown, shot and injured four people with a handgun in a district judge’s office on Wednesday before being killed by an unidentified German Township police officer.

State police in Uniontown on Thursday confirmed Dowdell’s identity.

Dowdell was due in District Judge Albert Shimshock’s office in Masontown on Wednesday on charges of strangulation and domestic violence.

According to court paperwork, his wife told him Aug. 24 that she wanted a divorce.

In her petition to the judge, she said he responded by twisting her arm until she dropped her phone, telling her that she could not call 911 and that there would be no divorce.

He had a gun in his hand, she said.

The next day, he allegedly wrapped a belt around her neck and pulled it tight, choking her. He again said there would be no divorce and “he would take out whoever he needed to take out” to prevent it, his wife recounted in court documents.

She managed to get away and call police.

Two days later, she petitioned George for a PFA, including a request that his gun be relinquished.

The judge issued a temporary PFA that day but did not include the language about the gun. Instead, the PFA says law enforcement officials should seize Dowdell’s weapons if he violates the terms of the order.

Dowdell was arrested for the alleged assault the next day and released on $10,000 bond.

George issued a final version of the PFA on Sept. 10, with similar language regarding firearms.

George and Fayette County Sheriff James Custer could not be reached for comment Thursday.

It is unknown whether Dowdell owned the handgun he used in Wednesday’s shootings.

The Tribune-Review found in March that about a quarter of local PFA orders require weapon seizures.

Dowdell shot Sgt. R. Scott Miller of the Mason­town Police Department and three civilians — two men and a woman, in the lobby of Shimshock’s office after 2 p.m. Wednesday. All were taken to hospitals with non-life-threatening injuries.

His motives are under investigation, but police said he was not targeting the judge or court employees.

Shimshock’s office will remain closed until further notice, the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts announced Thursday.

Cases scheduled to be heard there will be moved to surrounding court offices — in German Township, Nicholson Township, Point Marion, Springhill Township and Masontown Borough.

Staff writers Deb Erdley and Paul Peirce contributed. Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, jtierney@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Soolseem.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.