ShareThis Page
PennDOT: Roundabouts have made intersections across state safer |

PennDOT: Roundabouts have made intersections across state safer

PennDOT recently found that roundabouts, like this one at the intersection of routes 519 and 1055, reduced the number of crashes and injuries at intersections that used to be controlled by stop signs or signals.

Roundabouts have reduced the number of crashes and injuries at several intersections that used to be controlled by stop signs or signals, PennDOT said Thursday.

PennDOT reviewed data for 11 roundabouts at intersections that had at least three years of traffic data before and after roundabouts were installed. The intersections were in Allegheny, Beaver, Bucks, Chester, Cumberland, Perry, Dauphin, Delaware, Erie, Montgomery and York counties.

PennDOT said the data, based on police-submitted crash reports from 2000 through 2017, show:

• Fatalities were reduced by 100 percent (from two to zero)

• Serious injuries were reduced by 100 percent (from seven to zero)

• Minor injuries were reduced by 95 percent (from 19 to one)

• Possible/unknown severity injuries were reduced by 92 percent (from 49 to four)

• Crashes causing only property damage decreased by 2 percent (from 49 to 48)

• The total number of crashes dropped 47 percent (from 101 to 54).

PennDOT said roundabouts are frequently installed to address intersections with safety issues, but may also be installed to improve traffic flow.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.