ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania’s infrastructure gets C-minus, council says |

Pennsylvania’s infrastructure gets C-minus, council says

| Friday, November 16, 2018 1:33 p.m
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
The Tarentum Bridge. May 17, 2018.

Pennsylvania isn’t quite making the grade when it comes to its infrastructure.

The state earned a cumulative GPA of a C-minus on the 2018 Report Card for Pennsylvania’s Infrastructure .

The Pennsylvania State Council representing the Central Pennsylvania, Lehigh Valley, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh sections of the American Society of Civil Engineers present the 2018 report card.

The report was released Wednesday and included an evaluation of the state’s aviation, bridges, dams, drinking water, energy, freight rail, hazardous waste, inland waterways, levees, parks and recreation, passenger rail, ports, roads, schools, solid waste, stormwater, transit and wastewater.

The water categories received some of the lowest grades. Stormwater and drinking water each received D grades, while wastewater earned a D-minus.

Much of Pennsylvania’s water infrastructure requires repair, replacement, and capacity upgrades, according to a press release. Pipes are exceeding 100 years in age and there is a significant funding gap between dollars spent and what is needed.

Among the highest grades was the state’s freight rail, with a B, and parks and recreation and hazardous waste each with a B-minus. Freight rail infrastructure in the state has benefited from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s Freight Rail Bureau and private sector support.

The committee suggests that local and state government continue to make the infrastructure a priority and invest in improvement projects. They also suggest private industry should have a seat at the table to help identify new technologies and foster collaboration.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, or via Twitter @emilybalser.

Categories: Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.