ShareThis Page
Police charge Butler couple after toddler falls out second-story window |

Police charge Butler couple after toddler falls out second-story window

Megan Guza
| Monday, July 9, 2018 2:51 p.m
Michael and Ruth Blontz

Police have charged a Butler County couple who failed to seek medical attention for a toddler who fell out of a window while in their care last week, court records show.

Michael and Ruth Blontz, both 37 and of Butler, are both charged with endangering the welfare of children in relation to the July 3 incident.

Butler police said last week that the 2-year-old boy fell out of a second-story window sometime overnight Tuesday, but no one called 911 until 1 p.m. the next day. The child fell onto a concrete slab.

Another child in the room with the toddler heard him fall and went down to retrieve him, Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV reported. More than 12 hours later, a friend of the family called paramedics.

The Blontzes had been babysitting the toddler, who remains in the hospital. The TV station reported that social services took several other children from the home.

Charges against the pair were filed Friday.

Court records showed that Ruth Blontz remained in jail Monday, unable to post $5,000 bail. Michael Blontz was released Saturday on his own recognizance. A preliminary hearing for both is scheduled for July 23.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter .

Categories: Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.