ShareThis Page
Religion doesn’t belong in classroom |

Religion doesn’t belong in classroom

Mike Seate
| Tuesday, January 25, 2005 12:00 a.m

Not being the worshipful sort, I’m puzzled by the fight in the Dover Area School District in York County over the teaching of evolution.

On one side is a school board peppered with religious fundamentalists, people who are disgusted with the idea that their kids are being taught — gasp! — scientific theories about human origins in biology class.

On the other is a group of teachers and parents who aren’t comfortable with passing off intelligent design — or creationism lite — as science.

The side of the debate you choose depends on which of the following theories about how we got here you consider less offensive.

Can we accept, as the Christian fundamentalists do, that men and women sprang wholly formed from Adam and Eve• Or do we believe that we evolved from primates• The latter would at least explain the hair on Robin Williams’ back and most NFL linemen.

This shouldn’t be a matter for public debate.

In a perfect world, religion would be a private concern, something parents teach their kids in the home — sort of like the way your parents were responsible for which root vegetables you ate, or whether you ending up digging Jacques Brel records. If a person’s religious faith dictates that his daughters wear veils and never be seen by males, or if someone feels more comfortable believing that all those dinosaur skeletons in the Carnegie Museum are props leftover from the last Steven Spielberg blockbuster, that’s cool.

Those are private beliefs that have no place in a public institution built to educate children.

I feel most adults would be better off with a few healthy slugs of 80-proof Irish whiskey at the start of every day, but I’m smart enough not to petition the local school board to install flasks in classrooms for teachers.

Out in Dover, the issue is now in the hands of the lawyers, creatures who defy intelligent design and evolution by their very cold-blooded existence. With some teachers refusing to teach intelligent design, you have to wonder what the kids are learning these days — besides how to use rubber bands to launch a paper clips across the room.

This genuflecting and courtroom shenanigans prove there’s a dang good reason why public schools don’t allow religious groups to dictate curriculum. If they did, local high schools would look like the West Bank or Northern Ireland. Kids from opposing camps would spend study hall tossing pipe bombs at each other and exchanging automatic weapons fire.

Maybe that’s what the fundamentalists want, another pointless battle to prove whose side God is on. If there is a God, I’ll bet He wants the kids to learn something useful.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.