ShareThis Page
Rendell: Act 72 may become mandatory |

Rendell: Act 72 may become mandatory

The Associated Press
| Monday, May 2, 2005 12:00 a.m

GRANTVILLE — Gov. Ed Rendell ratcheted up the pressure on school boards to sign on to a $1 billion property-tax reduction program, saying state lawmakers might otherwise make the program mandatory.

School boards, which have until the end of May to opt in, have been slow to participate. In exchange for the future slots revenues, they must raise local income taxes and seek voter approval for future property-tax increases that exceed inflation.

“We may mandate it, there’s so much anger in the Legislature. We may mandate it without some of the exceptions that are worked in, and that would be a disaster,” Rendell said Saturday at a meeting of the Pennsylvania Associated Press Broadcasters Association.

Rendell said he had heard that Democratic legislators will introduce a bill today that would force school boards to participate in Act 72.

“Obviously, I think something has to be done,” Rendell said. “What is most vexing and frustrating to me is I am in favor of some limitations.”

As of Thursday, only 10 of Pennsylvania’s 501 school districts had chosen to participate in the program, a Pennsylvania School Board Association spokesman said.

Meanwhile, the state Supreme Court is reviewing a challenge to the act that alleges that lawmakers violated their own rules in passing the slots law last year.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.