Report: Nepotism in immigration court intern hires |

Report: Nepotism in immigration court intern hires

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The top three officials at the Justice Department agency that oversees the federal immigration court system used their positions to help relatives get paid internships, according to a report released Thursday by the Justice Department’s inspector general.

Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz found that Executive Office for Immigration Review Director Juan Osuna, Board of Immigration Appeals Chairman David Neal and Chief Immigration Judge Brian O’Leary each used their positions to help four relatives get hired in the agency’s Student Temporary Employment Program between 2007 and 2010.

Horowitz also found that between 2007 and 2012, about 16 percent of 200 interns hired were relatives of employees within the court system.

Justice Department spokeswoman Emily Pierce said the report was being reviewed but that changes had been made to the department’s hiring policies. Training on the revised hiring rules started this year, she said.

Horowitz started investigating in 2013 after EOIR officials disclosed concerns about past hires. The disclosure, he wrote, was prompted by a 2012 report on improper hiring practices in the Justice Management Division.

In 2008, Osuna, who was then acting chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals, or BIA, told a subordinate of his niece’s interest in working at EOIR and then passed along her resumé, according to the report. He helped her come back to the agency in 2009. The inspector general found that both efforts “violated several statutes and regulations, including the federal nepotism statute.”

Neal was found to have violated the nepotism statute by helping his son get an internship in 2010. At the time he was acting head of the BIA. The inspector general also found that in 2007, when Neal was chief immigration judge, he passed along his daughter’s resume to an EOIR employee, but investigations concluded there was not enough evidence to determine if he advocated for her to be hired. But investigators concluded that he used poor judgment in passing along the resume.

O’Leary, who was an immigration judge in 2009, was found to have intervened in the hiring process to make sure his daughter was selected for a particular EOIR unit.

The inspector general’s findings were referred to the Office of the Deputy Attorney general for review and possible disciplinary action.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.