Residents concerned equipment could cause safety hazard |

Residents concerned equipment could cause safety hazard

Residents of Bear Rocks have asked Bullskin Township supervisors to investigate a piece of equipment stored on a property at the corner of West Mountain View and Elm Street.

On Wednesday, residents told supervisors they were concerned the stainless steel, cylindrical piece of equipment may pose a safety risk to neighborhood children or to motorists or property if it were to roll.

Supervisors said they would ask code enforcement office Roger Adams to visit the property and determine if storing the object there violates any ordinances.

Supervisors Thursday also awarded Uniontown Industrial Equipment Co. the contract for a tire highlift.

Uniontown Industrial’s bid was for a Mega 160 Dae Woo wheel loader at a price of $71,634, less a trade-in of $15,000. This totaled $56,634.67.

Supervisors also received bids for a John Deere model 344 for $67,000 and a John Deere model 444H for $68,500. Both of these bids were submitted by Doyle Equipment of Cranberry Township.

Other bids included:r a Caterpillar 924G2 wheel loader for $68,808 submitted by Beckwith Machinery Co. of Murrysville; a Komatsu model WA180-3 for $65,156, submitted by Anderson Equipment Co. of Bridgeville.

Supervisor John Coughenour said the low bid submitted by Uniontown Industrial met the bid specs and the price was within the township’s budget. He added the bid award should be conditional upon approval of township solicitor Michael Macko.

Supervisors Wednesday also voted to set the 2003 Minimum Municipal Obligation (MMO) for the pension plan for union employees at $26,520 and for non-union employees at $18,550.

In other business:

  • Supervisors voted to have all Bullskin Township volunteer firefighters covered by the township’s insurance policy, and stated the township needs to be furnished with a roster of junior firemen.

  • Set trick-or-treat for the township 4 to 5 p.m. on Oct. 27.

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.