ShareThis Page
Residents upset about billboard |

Residents upset about billboard

| Wednesday, June 7, 2006 12:00 a.m

North End resident Tom Capella represented 51 of his Connellsville neighbors who signed a petition protesting a billboard at Monday’s city council meeting.

The double billboard, about 50 feet high, is located along Route 119 at West Gibson Avenue, the main entrance to the Connellsville Municipal Authority. Currently, both signs are blank.

“It’s a humongous billboard,” Capella told council. “It’s a hazard to residents and those paying their sewage bills.”

Capella said the distracting nature of such a large double sign would cause accidents.

He added the area is zoned commercial and industrial, “but most is residential. We want to be kept safe. Those homes have been there 100 years. There are more families than commercial property.”

He estimated there are 35 to 40 homes in the North End neighborhood.

Councilman David McIntire called the sign “the biggest I’ve ever seen. The sign looks awful. The sign permit was granted under the old sign ordinance.”

The new ordinance, effective in March, regulates the size and placement of billboards.

Councilman Charles Matthews said he voted for the sign to prevent a lawsuit, since it did not violate the ordinance in effect at the time of the vote.

“I thought PennDOT would deny the permit if there was a problem. I did not know about the safety problem until you spoke,” he told Capella.

PennDOT approved the sign.

City solicitor Gretchen Mundorff said the sign may not be considered a danger under the legal definition of “sight view obstruction.” Under that definition, an object prevents a driver from seeing the roadway.

However, Mundorff said, “Looking up at the sign is a distraction.”

She recommended that residents appeal to PennDOT. She said that she and city council will review the sign’s specifications.

Mayor Judy Reed said the city will send a letter to PennDOT.

“There is not enough time for people to observe the sign. It’s oversized for use in a city,” she said. “I have a problem with the height of the sign. I recommend that everyone call PennDOT.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.