Restaurateur abandons plans for North Side’s Garden Theater |

Restaurateur abandons plans for North Side’s Garden Theater

Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
The Garden Theater block along West North Avenue in the Central North Side neighborhood of Pittsburgh. January 1, 2014.

Domenic Branduzzi’s decision to scrap plans for a new restaurant in the Garden Theater on the North Side marks another setback for an area long considered an eyesore.

“The proposition to open another restaurant after two years of waiting for important infrastructure to be built is no longer feasible for me personally,” said Branduzzi, owner of Piccolo Forno restaurant in Lawrenceville, in a statement Tuesday.

Pittsburgh’s Urban Redevelopment Authority is seeking bids from developers for the Allegheny City Central project and expects to select one in December.

“We’ve received as of today between six or seven responses,” said Kyra Straussman, the URA’s director of real estate.

Several groups have considered moving into the area since the URA bought the former X-rated Garden Theater in 2007.

Initially, Aiello Development and JRA Development Group were given the opportunity to develop the project, and had plans that included a bank. In 2010, however, after Aiello failed to secure an anchor tenant, it left the project.

East End Food Co-op looked like the front-runner to take over but dropped out in 2011. The next year, city officials announced Nakama restaurant as a tenant for the Masonic Temple, adjacent to the theater, but it also dropped out.

The City of Asylum Pittsburgh, a North Side nonprofit that offers literary and community programs, is in the process of either renting or buying space in the temple from the URA.

Allegheny City Development Group LLC, headed by Wayne Zukin of Philadelphia, bought the theater a year ago but is no longer involved in the rest of the project.

Sam Spatter is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7843 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.