Retirement planning should consider Alzheimer’s
BOSTON — When it comes to retirement, there are lots of things to consider: tax rates, earthquakes, and drug interactions to name a few. But experts say there are two big elephants in the room with which many of us will have to deal, sooner or later.
One is trying to make up for lost time on the savings front by assuming you can work later in life. The other is a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, either for oneself or a close family member.
Let’s tackle the tougher one first.
Some 5.3 million people now have Alzheimer’s, according to a recent report issued by the Alzheimer’s Association. That’s roughly the population of Colorado. The disease is the seventh leading cause of death. There are some 10 million unpaid caregivers.
What’s worse still, there’s no end in sight: The prevalence of Alzheimer’s is expected to grow by more than 80 percent from 2000 to 2025 in at least nine states, including Colorado. By 2050, some 19 million Americans will have Alzheimer’s.
You don’t have go far in your family tree or on your Facebook page to realize that you’re just one degree of separation away from this disease.
So how should you tackle or at least think about this elephant in the room?
“Alzheimer’s disease is the largest thief of retirement,” said Chris Cooper, president of Chris Cooper & Company Inc. and ElderCare Advocates, Inc. “It is a slowly progressing disease, leaving the person oftentimes with good physical health and less mental faculties to use this good physical health.”
Americans are often diagnosed with Alzheimer’s in their late 60s and 70s, but it can and does occur earlier. And, Cooper said, many Americans fail to plan for the disease.
Because there’s a long three-to-20-year life span from diagnosis to death with Alzheimer’s disease, Cooper said retirement planning can be difficult. “You have to plan for a possible 20-year period of dependency on others to manage your resources, to make decisions for you, and see to your care and comfort as your fiduciary,” he said.
But just because it’s difficult doesn’t mean that you should avoid it. Instead, you have to confront it head on. “It is happening to more and more of us now, as our life expectancies increase,” he said.
The Employee Benefit Research Institute’s recent report about retirement confidence found that many Americans plan to keep working as a way to make up for not having saved enough or invested wisely enough for retirement, or as a way to keep health insurance.
But, as many have written before, working is not a fail-safe plan. Or is it?
Two new reports seem to indicate this elephant might be smaller than we think — unless, of course, you develop Alzheimer’s.
According to a recent Urban Institute report, unemployment rates for men and women age 55 and older did hit record highs in 2009. And older African-Americans, Hispanics and adults with limited education were especially likely to find themselves unemployed. Plus, the report noted that older adults who lost their jobs spent more time out of work than their younger counterparts.
Working in retirement does seem viable for some.
“My recommendation to workers is to delay retiring as long as possible — another three to five years, or even longer where feasible,” said Olivia S. Mitchell, associate director of the Financial Literacy Center. “Working longer preserves assets, yields higher eventual Social Security benefits, and probably results in people staying healthier, as compared to retiring early.”