Revenue-sharing parking option pitched in Pittsburgh |

Revenue-sharing parking option pitched in Pittsburgh

The head of a parking firm once courted to lease city garages and parking spaces said he’s still willing to salvage an agreement to bail out Pittsburgh’s pension funds, even as City Council started discussing another plan to raise money that avoids a lease.

Alan Lazowski, CEO of LAZ Parking, said Tuesday his company would be willing to enter into a revenue-sharing agreement with the city that includes an upfront payment the city could use to bolster its ailing pension funds.

“The window of opportunity is closing,” Lazowski said. “But we’re still hopeful everyone will see the light.”

Mayor Luke Ravenstahl this year reached an agreement with Pittsburgh Parking Partners, a group formed by J.P. Morgan and Lazowski’s Connecticut-based company, for a 50-year lease of parking facilities for $456 million. City Council members rejected that plan, saying their constituents opposed leasing. Council proposed selling some parking facilities to the Parking Authority to raise the pension money, but the authority refused to consider it.

If the city can’t raise the pensions from 27 percent funded to 50 percent funded by year’s end, the state will take them over and force sharply higher annual pension payments.

City Council yesterday introduced legislation directing Ravenstahl to renegotiate terms of an agreement with the Parking Authority so any increases in parking fines and meter rates would go directly to the pension funds through 2040.

The city needs about $220 million to avoid a takeover of the pensions. The latest plan does not provide an upfront payment, but council members said it provides a steady stream of revenue to the pension funds.

The 2011 budget assumes the city will receive $6.7 million from parking fines next year, a $1.1 million increase from this year. The city keeps all fine revenues, while the Parking Authority keeps about 93 percent of parking meter revenues.

The plan assumes that increased meter rates will generate an additional $6.1 million in revenue in 2011, a number that would rise steadily to $16.6 million in 2040.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.