ShareThis Page
Review: ‘High School Musical 3: Senior Year’ |

Review: ‘High School Musical 3: Senior Year’

The Associated Press
| Friday, October 24, 2008 12:00 a.m

Someday, Troy and Gabriella will actually open their mouths when they kiss. Someday, Sharpay won’t have backup dancers magically appear out of nowhere during her self-glorifying production numbers. But for now, everything about the “High School Musical” series remains safely wholesome and intact, even as it makes the leap from TV to the big screen.

All those winsome East High Wildcats are back from parts one and two of the freakishly successful Disney Channel franchise — Zac Efron, Vanessa Hudgens, Ashley Tisdale, Corbin Bleu, et al. — as are mad-genius director Kenny Ortega and writer Peter Barsocchini. Only now, they have more expensive toys to play with, so the production values are glossier and the musical numbers are splashier.

But even as Part Three wallows in nostalgia, with the kids preparing for prom and clinging to their senior year, it’s also clearly meant as a launching pad for the grown-up career of the dreamy Efron; one big dance sequence makes it obvious why he was chosen to star in the remake of “Footloose.”

Will it win any new fans• Doubtful. If you’re not the parent, aunt or uncle of a 9-year-old, you’ve probably managed to keep the whole “HSM” phenomenon at the periphery of your consciousness, and you’ll continue to do so. But for those kids in the target audience, this is, like, movie nirvana.

And the adults forced to schlep with them to the multiplex• They’ll find it surprisingly tolerable. The “HSM” kids are so good-looking and high-energy, you may as well surrender to their manipulative ways.

• In wide release

Additional Information:

‘High School Musical 3: Senior Year’

Rated G
Two and a half stars
(out of four)

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.