ShareThis Page
Review: ‘Hot Tub Time Machine’ funny but no ‘Hangover’ |

Review: ‘Hot Tub Time Machine’ funny but no ‘Hangover’

Roger Moore
| Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:00 a.m

“Hot Tub Time Machine’s” title may say it all. But just in case it doesn’t, here’s an alternative — “Back to The Hangover.”

A sloppy, raucous, time travel farce in the grown-men-gone-wild “Hangover” style, it’s a surprisingly satisfying, if not exactly “LMAO,” riot.

Nick (Craig Robinson) works at a dog grooming parlor, ‘Sup Dawg.’ But back in the day, he had a band.

Adam (John Cusack) just got dumped. Again. He’s a lonely insurance agent, but once upon a time, he had friends.

And Lou (Rob Corddry) has become a “raging alcoholic,” a guy whose life is so trapped in the past that he’s hospitalized after jamming out to hair metal in his vintage Trans Am in his garage — nearly asphyxiating himself. He used to be the life of the party, “Lou-cipher, aka Violator.”

Lou’s carbon monoxide moment forces all of them to ask “What happened to us?”

“We were young,” Adam whines. “We had momentum. We were winning.”

They resolve to recapture past glory by making a road trip to the ski lodge of their youth, reviving Lou with a little snow and hedonism. Kodiak Valley is now a dump, the bellhop (Crispin Glover, a hoot) now an embittered, one-armed jerk.

But a short circuit in a hot tub changes everything — the hair, the clothes, the “Alf” playing on the TV in the background. The male-bonders have landed back in their alleged heyday, the ’80s. Adam’s nerdy nephew (Clark Duke of “Sex Drive”) is the one to figure it out, because “I write ‘Stargate’ FAN fiction!”

What follows is a hit-or-miss riff on a decade that has never provoked the sort of fond nostalgia that the ’50s, 60s or ’70s did. As Cusack’s Adam mutters, “Reagan. And AIDS. I HATE this decade!”

But as they struggle to take what they know of time travel from bad movies (“The Butterfly Effect” is a point of reference), they discover where they went wrong, the details their memories got wrong, how they let each other down, how their “momentum” changed.

There are some big laughs (Robinson lands most of them), a few great running gags (How Glover’s character lost his arm) and the “Back to the Future” sweet moments of reflection mostly work. It’s not “The Hangover,” but at least this “Hot Tub” won’t have you hating yourself in the morning.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.