ShareThis Page
Review: Pittsburgh New Music Ensemble pays tribute to Hungarian composer |

Review: Pittsburgh New Music Ensemble pays tribute to Hungarian composer

Mark Kanny

New music enthusiasts don’t only look to the future. Weekend concerts by the Pittsburgh New Music Ensemble were a belated homage to Gyorgi Ligeti, the Hungarian composer who died in 2006 and was one of the most admired composers of his generation.

The program was built around Ligeti’s “Musica Ricerata” — 11 movements for solo piano written in the early 1950s that were constructed out of sets of notes — starting with only two pitches in the first piece and concluding with a piece based on tone row of 12 pitches.

Pianist Conor Hanick played Ligeti’s music with lucidity, power and fine control. He also was alert to Ligeti’s wit. In the fourth movement, “Tempo di valse,” Hanick’s crisp articulation gave natural emphasis to meter changes while his tempo flexibility produced traditional emotional feelings.

Ligeti’s music was garnished between each movement with more contemporary music. Emmanuel Sejourne’s “Vous avez de feu?” (Do you have a light?) was virtually silent. The only sound was that of cigarette lighters being lit, but the point was the visual patterns that were set up and played with. Theirry de Mey’s “Musique de Tables” has musicians’ hands dance across the tables or, in this case, three wooden tablets Saturday night at City Theatre. It succeeds through rhythmic coherence and the wit of the choreography for the hands. Other shorter pieces served differing aspirations from seriousness to facetiousness.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.