ShareThis Page
Review: Tomlin’s Ernestine updated |

Review: Tomlin’s Ernestine updated

| Monday, February 9, 2009 12:00 a.m

It’s a testament to Lily Tomlin that characters such as Ernestine and 5-year-old Edith Ann remain fresh and funny as they were 40 years ago on “Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In.”

Some updating helps. In her one-woman show at the Benedum on Saturday, Tomlin’s Ernestine had been laid off from the telephone company and now works for an HMO. Cheerful and ruthless as ever, she cheerfully rejected claims from callers, explaining to one that “blindness is a pre-existing condition” and “you should have read the fine print.” She punctuated the zingers with that trademark chuckle and snort.

The stand-up portion of the show included a bit of good-natured civic pandering to Pittsburgh and the Steelers. (She said she was proud of her “kid brother, Mike”). Apart from a few tiresome swipes at big targets (Bush, Cheney, Republicans), Tomlin’s childlike charisma, tinged with an endearing neurosis, helped put the jokes across. She may be at her best as a storyteller, as she demonstrated with some anecdotes from her Detroit childhood, particularly with a piece about her schoolgirl crush on her second-grade teacher.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.