Rex Energy puts Marcellus shale drilling site work in Middlesex on hold during appeals |

Rex Energy puts Marcellus shale drilling site work in Middlesex on hold during appeals

Rex Energy has suspended development of a controversial Marcellus shale drilling site in Middlesex, Butler County, until appeals are settled, according to a letter sent to several people who live in the area.

“At this time, the duration of the delay in operations is not known,” said the letter from Mary Ann Fox, vice president of land development for State College-based Rex.

On Oct. 9, two environmental groups and four residents appealed changes to Middlesex’s zoning ordinances that allowed Marcellus shale drilling in most of the township. The hearing before the zoning board is scheduled for 4:30 p.m. Nov. 18.

“The law prevents them (Rex) from going forward when there’s been a zoning hearing board challenge,” said attorney Jordan Yeager, who is representing the parties appealing the zoning decision.

The groups, Clean Air Council in Philadelphia, and Delaware Riverkeeper Network in Bucks County, along with David Denk, Jennifer Chomicki, Anthony Lapina and Joanne Groman, also filed an appeal with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection’s Environmental Hearing Board. That appeal challenges the DEP’s issuance of a well permit. A hearing hasn’t been scheduled yet.

Rex would drill five wells off Denny Road. The company said Monday that construction at the site is complete, including installation of erosion and sediment controls.

Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.