ShareThis Page
‘Rights’ charade |

‘Rights’ charade

| Sunday, January 2, 2011 12:00 a.m

Unable to advance “card check” and other union-coddling measures, Team Obama has tossed yet another bone to organized labor.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which includes three recess appointments by President Obama, has proposed a new rule requiring most private-sector employers to inform workers of their “rights” — specifically their right to unionize . Notice of this new rule was submitted last month to the Federal Register, which allows a 60-day comment period.

It would require that the “rights” notice be posted alongside all other workplace memos — or sent electronically if an employer uses e-mail to communicate with staffers.

The NLRB rule couldn’t be more union-sympathetic: “(E)mployees have the right to act together to improve wages and working conditions, to form, join and assist a union, to bargain collectively with their employers, and to choose not to do any of these activities.”

And what better time than during the holidays for the supposedly “independent” NLRB to slip through a rule with serious ramifications for employers in the private sector, where only 7.2 percent of employees are union members. Airline, railroad and agricultural businesses would be excluded.

What’s proposed is another thinly veiled sop to unions — government encouragement to unionize. Employers shouldn’t be forced to tolerate it.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.