ShareThis Page
Ringgold coach Humbert extended |

Ringgold coach Humbert extended

| Friday, November 26, 2010 12:00 a.m

After coaching Ringgold High School’s football team to a conference championship, it appears as if Matt Humbert will provide the program with much-needed stability.

At last month’s school board meeting Humbert was awarded with a new four-year contract.

In his initial season as the Rams’ head coach, Humbert guided Ringgold to a perfect 9-0 regular season before the team lost in the Class AAA playoffs to eventual semifinalist Central Valley.

“Obviously we’re excited what’s Matt’s done with the football program and the energy he brings,” said Ringgold Athletic Director Ron McMichael. “I believe everyone noticed his focus and commitment not only to the program but more importantly the kids.”

The nine wins Ringgold produced this past season is the third most in school history and the first undefeated football regular season in the program’s history. The Rams’ best single-season records were 12-1 in 1982 under head coach Bill Connors and 10-1-1 under Joe Ravasio in 1987.

Humbert, who was an assistant coach in 2009, is Ringgold’s 14th different head coach since the school district was formed in 1969. The last Ringgold head coach that led the team for more than two seasons was Chuck Colborn from 1993-99.

Humbert, a Laurel Highlands High School graduate, served as interim coach for two games in 2009, which were both Ringgold victories.

“This is definitely a good thing,” McMichael said about Humbert’s extension. “He’s an up-and-coming head coach who only wants to get better.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.