ShareThis Page
Ringgold surprises Lady Scots |

Ringgold surprises Lady Scots

CARROLL TOWNSHIP — Ringgold High’s girls faced one of the WPIAL’s hotter teams and players in Southmoreland and its 5-6 senior Vanessa Abel Tuesday.

Abel had another big night with 34 points but it wasn’t enough as the Lady Rams (7-4, 4-2) knocked the Lady Scots (10-2, 5-1) out of first place in Class AAA Section 3 with a convincing 58-41 victory.

By snapping Southmoreland’s seven-game winning streak, Ringgold remained tied for third place with Mt. Pleasant and Derry Area, where the Lady Rams play Thursday.

It was freshman Alina Selby and sophomore Emily Schartner. who sparked Ringgold’s biggest league win of the season.

Selby scored a career-high 26 points, including 11 in the second quarter when Ringgold stretched a 13-7 lead to 31-19 at halftime.

Schartner added 14 points, but it was her play on defense that impressed Ringgold coach Joe Ravasio.

“Emily did a good job on No. 33 (Anna Coffman),” said Ravasio. “We knew Abel would score her 25 points and felt we had to shut No. 33 down.”

Coffman was limited to two points with a fourth-quarter basket.

Abel, who accounted for all but one of Southmoreland’s first half points, gave the Lady Scots a quick 2-0 lead before the Lady Rams went ahead to stay with the next 10 points on two baskets by Schartner, one each by Lisa Sanko and Bethany Warren and a pair of free throws by Selby.

Although Abel carried Southmoreland in the middle two periods, Ravasio praised Sanko — Ringgold’s lone senior starter — who had to guard the standout guard.

“Abel is very good and so quick,” he said. “Lisa made her work for her points and a lot came in transition.”

“Our girls really rebounded well and I like the tempo we had,” added Ravasio.

Besides starring offensively, the 5-10 Selby led the Lady Rams on the boards with 16 rebounds.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.