ShareThis Page
River Forest residents vow sewage plant fight |

River Forest residents vow sewage plant fight

| Tuesday, April 5, 2005 12:00 a.m

ALLEGHENY TOWNSHIP — River Forest resident Jim Huckestein said residents will fight any attempt to put a sewage treatment facility in that section of the township.

Huckestein was one af about six River Forest residents who attended the Allegheny Township Municipal Authority meeting Monday. He said some residents have met with an attorney to discuss their options.

“We’re not going to have it built in River Forest, that’s all there is to it,” Huckestein said.

River Forest Partners has proposed an expansion of the development that would bring in an additional 400 homes and 200 assisted living units — and an estimated 1,000 to 1,200 new residents — to the river front neighborhood.

Currently, there are roughly 60 single-family homes in River Forest.

To service the expansion — which would include single-family homes, carriage and patio homes as well as the assisted living facilities — the developers are tentatively proposing building a small sewerage plant, also called a “package plant,” on the grounds of neighboring River Forest Country Club.

Herman Tomer, an official with River Forest Partners wasn’t at the meeting, but when contacted by phone said they’ve tried unsuccessfully since 2001 to find another sewage system to connect with, and at this time the “package plant” appears to be the best option.

Huckestein said residents aren’t opposed to the development, but said a sewage plant could lower property values because it could create noise and odor.

Tomer said they have been very forthcoming with residents. He disagrees with the belief that that the plant would have an adverse effect on the area. They are basing projections on a 200,000-gallon capacity.

“We run a golf course and we are intending to put it on our property,” he said. “It would be entirely sealed. You don’t see them, you don’t smell them and you don’t hear them.”

Municipal authority member Frank Paolo said the authority doesn’t know much about the plan.

“We have not gotten anything from River Forest,” Paolo said. “At this point, the ball is in their court.”

Authority Solicitor Bernie Matthews said the treatment plant would have to be approved by the state Department of Environmental Protection.

“The DEP is going to be the most important agency when it comes to location,” Matthews said. “It’s really in their hands at this point.”

Tomer said the plan has received preliminary approval from township supervisors and they have been in contact with engineers as well as PennDOT and DEP officials.

Tomer didn’t say Monday when officials expect to break ground.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.