ShareThis Page
River victim quiet, sweet |

River victim quiet, sweet

| Tuesday, January 11, 2005 12:00 a.m

WEST BROWNSVILLE – A Washington County man who drowned when a towboat and coal barges went over a dam on the Ohio River early Sunday was remembered as a quiet, easygoing student.

Edward Michael Crevda, 22, of West Brownsville, was one of three men confirmed dead when the swollen Ohio River pushed the vessels over Montgomery Locks and Dam in Industry, Beaver County. A fourth man is missing and presumed dead.

Crevda was working as a deckhand for Campbell Transportation Co. Inc., of Dunlevy.

He was a 2000 Brownsville Area High School graduate.

Principal Richard Gates said Monday that Crevda visited him at the high school last month.

“He just stopped by not long ago and said how things were going good for him,” Gates said. “He said he was happy with the way everything was going.”

Gates and one of Crevda’s former high school teachers, Linda Karol, described Crevda as a well-behaved, quiet student.

“He was a real sweet boy with a good sense of humor,” Karol said. Crevda’s parents, Gary and Linda Redman Crevda, both of West Brownsville, could not be reached yesterday.

In addition to his parents, Edward Crevda is survived by two sisters, Nikki and Nicole; his maternal grandmother, Norma J. Redman; and his girlfriend, Melissa Hiszanick.

The Skirpan Funeral Home, Brownsville, is handling the funeral arrangements.

Tom Fisher, of Latrobe, and Scott Stewart, 36, of Elm Grove, W. Va., were killed. Rick Conklin, of Crucible, Greene County, is missing.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.