ShareThis Page
Riverview girls come from behind to beat South Allegheny in overtime |

Riverview girls come from behind to beat South Allegheny in overtime

| Monday, January 7, 2013 10:30 p.m
Valley News Dispatch
Riverview's Sadie Buchser steps in front of South Allegheny's MiKayla Stearns for the steal during second half Monday, Jan. 7, 2013 (Bill Shirley | For The Valley News Dispatch)

South Allegheny found itself in an unfamiliar position on the road Monday in its section game at Riverview.

Not only did the Gladiators have a lead late in the third quarter, but they were in a spread offense to run the clock and play for the final shot.

That was when the complexion of the game changed.

Riverview freshman Sadie Buscher stole an errant cross-court pass and went coast to coast for a layup as part of her game-high 20 points. She then scored four of the team’s 10 overtime points to help the Raiders to a 54-44 come-from-behind victory over South Allegheny (4-7, 0-4) that may have quashed the Gladiators’ hopes of qualifying for the WPIAL Class AA playoffs.

“I think we need to be stronger with the ball on offense,” South Allegheny coach Ashleigh Hays said. “Sometimes we get down after one, maybe two turnovers and we have to learn how to be mentally tough coming back from that; making the right play call and going from there.”

At the time of Buscher’s steal, South Allegheny had opened a 33-27 lead thanks to back-to-back baskets from Abby Dranko. Riverview missed a pair of free throws with 42.3 seconds left, and the Gladiators were in a position to either extend their lead to eight or take a six-point advantage into the fourth quarter.

Then Buscher stole the pass and went in for a layup to cut the deficit to 33-29 with 5.1 seconds remaining. At that point, Riverview turned up the defense and forced four South Allegheny turnovers in the first 1:04 of the fourth quarter as the Raiders engineered a 9-0 run to take a 36-33 lead.

“Sadie’s been in kind of a scoring slump, and I told her the other day that she’s so gifted athletically that she should be able to get eight or 10 points a game off the defensive end,” Riverview coach Keith Stitt said. “We got into it at that point and got a little bit of a lead, but to their credit, they hung in there.”

Jaylee Patterson was one of the big reasons. The senior guard hit a clutch 3-pointer to tie the score at 36, then hit another with 33.8 seconds remaining to knot the game, 44-44, and send it to overtime.

South Allegheny had an opportunity to win the game in regulation after a Riverview turnover with 18.9 seconds left. The Gladiators set up in the offensive half, then called their final timeout with 8 seconds left but didn’t get a shot off before the buzzer.

“Our screens didn’t go as we planned, and it didn’t go as we drew it up, but that happens in basketball,” Hays said. “Every second something different is going on, and you just have to adapt and go with it. We need to be more aware of the clock and the time, and on the last shot, we need to get to that last shot and throw it up.”

South Allegheny may need to win six of its final eight Section 3 games to qualify for the playoffs.

“I think the biggest thing is to keep this positive attitude we have going and to keep working hard every single day and keep executing our plays and everyone knowing their role,” Hays said. “I think we can do good the rest of the season.”

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @KBarnes_Trib.

Categories: News
Tags: |
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.