ShareThis Page
RMU drops heartbreaker to Albany |

RMU drops heartbreaker to Albany

The Associated Press
| Sunday, December 22, 2002 12:00 a.m

ALBANY, N.Y. — Earv Opong made two free throws with 2.6 seconds remaining to lead Albany to a 69-67 victory over Robert Morris on Saturday.

The Great Danes (2-4) led 67-65 with 51 seconds left, when Jamar Wilson, who totaled a career-high 30 points and 11 rebounds, nailed a three-point field goal from the left corner.

Robert Morris (3-3) drew even at 67-67 on a pair of foul shots by senior guard DaMarcus Ellis with 19 seconds left.

Albany built a 49-38 cushion midway through the final period. Wilson hit a jumper in the lane off a dribble-drive to give the Great Danes their biggest lead.

The Colonials rallied with 13 of the game’s next 15 points. Ellis scored off a goaltending call before Maurice Carter, who led Robert Morris with 24 points, canned a 3-pointer to tie at 51 apiece.

Opong was fouled on a drive to the basket by Carter to set up his winning free throws, his only points of the game. Carter sank two foul shots for a 65-62 lead, before Wilson hit a driving layup and put Albany in front with a three-pointer.

Rhasheed Peterson scored a season-high 17 points for Albany and Levi Levine finished with 12 points.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.