Robinson stops enforcement of ban on political signs |

Robinson stops enforcement of ban on political signs

Robinson suspended its enforcement of a ban on political signs in rights of way on Friday after the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania threatened to take legal action, a township official said.

Claiming the township was unfairly removing political signs only for Republican candidates for the board of commissioners in the Nov. 5 election, the Republican Committee of Robinson Township filed a complaint with the ACLU in September.

The ACLU sent a letter, dated Oct. 23, to Robinson stating that the sign ordinance was illegal because bans of signs on public property are legal only if all types of signs are prohibited, and it alleged that Robinson was allowing advertising signs and signs promoting judges.

Robinson agreed to the ACLU’s request to suspend its ordinance until at least after the election, township Manager Jeffrey Silka said.

“After consulting with the solicitor, we thought it was in the best interest to suspend the ordinance and take a look at it at the upcoming meetings,” he said.

Tory N. Parrish is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5662 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.