ShareThis Page
Roddey needs an about-face campaign |

Roddey needs an about-face campaign

| Thursday, October 9, 2003 12:00 a.m

Jim Roddey must find some raw meat for starving voters to sink their teeth into.

The incumbent Allegheny County chief executive needs to serve up an issue that the public can devour, one that says to undecided voters that he is something other than Onorato Lite.

County Controller Dan Onorato, a North Side Democrat, is challenging Roddey, a Squirrel Hill Republican, in the general election.

Roddey is positioning himself as a “good government” administrator. Onorato is doing the same packaging. Both can claim truth-in-advertising on that issue. Both are starting to attack each other’s squeaky-clean records.

The voters might agree with some of the accusations. But it would take an extraordinary set of circumstances, or dumb luck, for either to be mortally wounded by their track records, even though Onorato voted for many of the failed economic schemes of Mayor Tom Murphy.

If Roddey is to overcome the massive Democratic voter-registration majority in the county — and the negative publicity he unfairly received during the reassessment controversies — he must offer a compelling reason to vote for him, and not just reasons not to vote for his opponent.

During a moment of clarity after seeing their attack ads, I could not name an issue clearly differentiating the Roddey administration from an Onorato one. Apparently, I am not the only one.

Several people walking along the Allegheny River behind PNC Park who described themselves as registered voters in the county also could not picture a difference in the administrations when asked whether they could think of one.

“I am not the most informed,” said Patti Webb, who works in the insurance business. “No, I can’t.”

“I’m really not sure,” said John Stroh, director of programming for Fox Sports Pittsburgh. “I plead ignorance.”

“I have no idea,” said Steve Kirk, who works in the transcribing field.

“I do not know,” said computer programmer Jim Hutchinson.

Michele May, who works at a Downtown bank, said that Onorato is more likely to have a tax-and-spend philosophy. Still, May said she isn’t sure what, if any, change there would be.

“I do not have an opinion at this time,” said accountant Rich Votilla.

“I have no idea,” said paralegal Elaine Miller. “I have not been following anything.”

Hardly good bumper-sticker material for either candidate.

Roddey, a former officer in the Marines, might be fighting the last war.

The “good government candidate” strategy he used four years ago against his opponent, Allegheny County Coroner Dr. Cyril Wecht, barely worked against the poster boy for the old Democratic city machine. Onorato is no Wecht when it comes to alienating people.

If Roddey is to avoid becoming a one-term county chief executive, he must serve an answer to the little old lady in that classic Wendy’s commercial who asked: “Where’s the beef?”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.