ShareThis Page
Roethlisberger practices, listed as ‘questionable’ |

Roethlisberger practices, listed as ‘questionable’

| Friday, December 14, 2007 12:00 a.m

Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger practiced Friday after missing the first two practices this week and is listed as questionable for Sunday’s game against Jacksonville at Heinz Field.

“Questionable” means Roethlisberger has a 50-50 chance of starting.

Roethlisberger suffered a sore right throwing shoulder in the Steelers loss at New England. He sat out practice Wednesday and Thursday, raising the possibility that he might be too injured to play in the team’s final home game of the season.

Yesterday, Roethlisberger sounded like he expected to play against Jacksonville.

“I feel great,” he said.

Asked if one hit caused his shoulder discomfort, Roethlisberger smiled.

“I got hit a couple of times.”

Roethlisberger said the hit on his shoulder that caused him to miss two practices occured “later in the game.”

Roethlisberger said it was important for him to practice yesterday. Starters who miss the final practice of the week usually don’t play on Sunday.

“That’s why I wanted to get out there, get some plays in, get some reps, get the feel for it,” Roethlisberger said. “I think it was good.”

Backup Charlie Batch practiced with the first team Wednesday and Thursday and will start if Roethlisberger doesn’t play.

Roethlisberger was asked if he “aired it out” in practice to test his arm strength.

“You have to ask Coach (Mike) Tomlin,” Roethlisberger said.

Tomlin didn’t speak with reporters yesterday.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.