Archive

Ross 2016 budget keeps same tax rate | TribLIVE.com
News

Ross 2016 budget keeps same tax rate

Tony LaRussa

The Ross proposed budget for 2016 earmarks money to cover modest increases for salaries, improving ball fields and controlling storm water while keeping the property-tax rate at its current level.

The $18.7 million spending plan, which will increase by 3.2 percent over this year, anticipates nearly $6.7 million in revenue from property taxes and $6.9 million from the earned-income taxand levies on businesses. The bulk of the remaining revenue will be generated by fees and sources such as grants. About $777,000 will be carried over from this year's budget.

Commissioner Jeremy Shaffer said the goal when developing a budget is to provide services to residents and businesses while keeping an eye on the tax impact.

“We want to be good stewards of the public's money,” he said. “We try to keep taxes low to encourage growth in the township while at the same time investing in our infrastructure.”

In addition to paying for salary increases that range between 2 percent and 4 percent, the township has set aside $50,000 to begin addressing the deterioration on three ball fields ; $70,000 to hire a computer specialist; and $85,000 — up from about $28,000 this year — to pay for engineering related to storm water management.

Plans call for paving about 4 miles of road, which is about the same that was done this year. The township is responsible for maintaining about 120 miles of roads.

Next year's budget calls for maintaining the tax on real estate at 2.7 mills, which means the owner of property with an assessed value of $100,000 will continue to pay $270 a year in property taxes to fund municipal operations.

Tony LaRussa is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.