ShareThis Page
Ross police officer quits over marijuana find |

Ross police officer quits over marijuana find

Bill Vidonic
| Wednesday, September 1, 2010 12:00 a.m

A former Ross police officer said Tuesday his “curiosity” over a 2-foot-tall marijuana plant he found and watered brought an abrupt end to his 30-year career.

Richard D. White, 58, said he has no idea how police found out about the plant and said he was told to resign after a meeting with police Chief Ralph C. Freedman on Aug. 23.

“I do regret it,” White said outside his Shaler home. “I should have just kicked it over right away.”

Ross police said an internal investigation determined that an officer might be involved in “illegal activity concerning marijuana.”

Police and township officials did not name the officer.

Detective Brian Kohlhepp said Ross turned over results of the investigation to the Allegheny County District Attorney.

Mike Manko, spokesman for District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr., said members of the office met with Ross police yesterday and are assisting in the investigation.

“We received a request from Ross Township to assist in this investigation. We expect to say more about the results of the investigation (today),” Manko said.

White, a traffic officer, said he found the plant while on duty about a month ago as he was urinating in a wooded area off Cemetery Lane.

White said he watered the plant once, again while on duty, but said he didn’t have any plan for the illegal plant.

A week after he first saw it, White said, he destroyed the plant.

“After I thought about it, I got rid of it. I said this was stupid and pulled it out of the ground.”

White said he didn’t tell fellow officers about his find, so he’s not sure how police knew of the plant. When confronted by Freedman, White said, he didn’t deny the accusation.

White said his resignation was effective the day he met with Freedman. Kohlhepp would only say an officer was removed from duty and no longer is employed by the township.

Township Commissioner Peter A. Ferraro said police notified commissioners about the accusation last week. Commissioners wanted the matter to be turned over to the district attorney’s office so there would be no perception that officials were covering up the case.

“We stand behind our police department 100 percent,” Ferraro said. “Whatever it is, we’ll face it and get through it.”

Solicitor Bonnie Brimmeier would not comment, saying it was a personnel issue.

Staff writer Bobby Kerlik contributed to this report.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.