ShareThis Page
Rostraver police nab fugitive from Florida |

Rostraver police nab fugitive from Florida

S.K. Musisko
| Tuesday, May 8, 2001 12:00 a.m

The long arm of the law reached across time and distance to track down a convicted rapist who was living in Pricedale.

Rostraver Township Police Chief Greg Resetar said officers last week arrested a fugitive from justice – Johnny Arnold Logan, 56, of 72 Zundel St.

‘This is an old, old case,’ Resetar said. ‘This guy has an extensive criminal history dealing with kids.’

Resetar said Logan is wanted in Brevard County, Fla., on charges that he twice violated probation stemming from a 1978 case in Titusville. In that case, Logan served time for lewd and lascivious assault, sexual battery and kidnapping.

Resetar reported that Logan, who sometimes uses the alias Edward Arnold Osborne, also served time in Washington County in the early 1970s on charges of statutory rape and corrupting the morals of minors. Resetar said Logan listed himself as a female on the police report filed.

Officers from Brevard County tracked Logan down through the U.S. Postal Service, and eventually realized he was receiving mail in Pricedale under two names.

Brevard County issued a warrant for Logan’s arrest and asked Rostraver police to pick him up. Resetar said Logan wasn’t at home when officers first went to arrest him. Neighbors were asked to call 911 when Logan returned home.

When police arrived, Logan tried to escape out the back door, ‘but we had the canine unit out there and he thought better of it,’ Resetar said.

The chief said there is no statute of limitations on probation violations. Logan may waive extradition to Florida or fight it through the court system.

In the meantime, he is being held in Westmoreland County Prison on $50,000 bond imposed by night court District Justice Mark Mansour.

Musisko is a reporter for the Tribune-Review.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.