ShareThis Page
Rostraver police seeking would-be burglar |

Rostraver police seeking would-be burglar

| Wednesday, June 6, 2001 12:00 a.m

A would-be house burglar fled yesterday after discovering the elderly residents of the house he was trying to enter near Crawford Lane at 12:29 p.m. were home, Rostraver Township Police Chief Greg Resetar said.

According to Resetar, the residents said the suspect allegedly rang the front doorbell repeatedly before going to the back door to do the same. The couple refused to answer the doorbell.

After fleeing on foot, the suspect returned with an axe in an attempt to gain access through the back door, the elderly couple told police. When the attempted robber saw the couple was home, though, he fled in a dirty white four-door car parked on Crawford Lane, Resetar said.

A house next door was robbed, Resetar said. The attempted burglar is a suspect in that robbery also.

‘My concern is what would have happened if she (the homeowner) had answered the front door,’ Resetar said.

Resetar said the man could have represented himself to the couple as a utility service man or salesman to gain access to the house. He said anyone who sees suspicious activity should contact police immediately.

Police are looking for a white male in his late teens or early twenties with brownish-blond hair and medium build. The suspect was last seen wearing a black T-shirt with gold lettering, a lighter colored long sleeve shirt underneath, a black baseball cap turned backwards, and wrap-around sunglasses, Resetar said. The suspect was also clean-shaven, he said.

The suspect fled in a white four-door compact car that resembled a Honda.

Anyone with information about the suspect or the automobile or anyone who experienced someone ringing the doorbell repeatedly should contact Rostraver Police at 929-8811.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.