ShareThis Page
Ruling keeps nuns’ house off tax rolls |

Ruling keeps nuns’ house off tax rolls

| Wednesday, March 10, 2004 12:00 a.m

An order of nuns that successfully sued Fayette County to have its small retreat house taken off the tax rolls has won an appeal brought by the county.

The Benedictine Sisters of Pittsburgh filed suit last year against the county after an unsuccessful attempt to have a 4.2-acre Springfield Township property removed from the tax rolls.

The sisters purchased the property in 1987 for $69,000. It has a small ranch house on the property that was built in 1960, according to tax records.

After trial in Common Pleas Court last year, the request was granted over the county’s objections.

The nuns testified that the property was used for spiritual retreats, adoration, prayer, meditation and an occasional Mass.

The county appealed to Commonwealth Court, which held in a short opinion handed down this week that the property was used for “regularly stated worship” and was not a vacation home, as the county had contended.

County Solicitor Joe Ferens said he will confer with commissioners to determine the county’s position on whether to appeal to the state Supreme Court.

Prior to the decision, the property was billed approximately $1,216 annually in property taxes.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.