ShareThis Page
Russian parliament sets anti-terror priorities |

Russian parliament sets anti-terror priorities

The Associated Press
| Wednesday, September 22, 2004 12:00 a.m

MOSCOW — Stricter penalties for people who help terrorists and for officials whose negligence aids attacks are priorities for the upper house of parliament’s new anti-terror measures, Russian officials said Tuesday.

The Kremlin-controlled Federation Council is expected to meet Sept. 29 to consider anti-terror legislation in response to a series of dramatic attacks in Russia that have killed more than 430 people in the past month.

Viktor Ozerov, the head of the council’s defense and security affairs committee, said about 40 anti-terrorism bills are in the works.

Some bills call for the reintroduction of the death penalty for terror attacks. Russia has maintained a moratorium on executions since 1996, an obligation it assumed after joining the Council of Europe.

Ozerov pointed at the example of the United States, where the death penalty is legal. “The United States doesn’t look for anyone’s guidance on issues relating to its security,” he said at a news conference.

Other proposals include streamlining law enforcement and conducting an inventory of the nation’s arms arsenals, Ozerov said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.