ShareThis Page
Sabres top Flyers in OT |

Sabres top Flyers in OT

The Associated Press
| Saturday, April 9, 2011 12:00 a.m

BUFFALO, N.Y. — Thomas Vanek scored 1:16 into overtime to cap a two-goal comeback and clinch a playoff berth for the Buffalo Sabres with a 4-3 victory over the slumping Philadelphia Flyers on Friday night.

Vanek finished with a goal and two assists, and Nathan Gerbe scored twice, including a spin-around goal that tied it midway through the third period. The Sabres already had secured a postseason spot by earning a point when the game entered overtime. With the win, they’ve clinched at least seventh in the Eastern Conference.

Danny Briere and Scott Hartnell had a goal and assist, and Kris Versteeg also scored for Philadelphia, which is winless in its past five games (0-3-2). The Flyers and Penguins are tied atop the Atlantic Division with 104 points.

— Lightning 4, Panthers 2 — In Tampa, Fla., Vincent Lecavalier had two goals, including one on a penalty shot, for Tampa Bay.

Lecavalier put the Lightning up, 3-1, when he deked goalie Scott Clemmensen to the ice and lifted home a wrist shot on his penalty shot at 1:27 of the second. The Tampa Bay captain also had a first-period power-play goal.

— Hurricanes 6, Thrashers 1 — In Atlanta, Jeff Skinner and Tuomo Ruutu each had a goal and two assists, as Carolina moved closer to an Eastern Conference playoff spot.

Carolina needs a home win today over Tampa Bay or a regulation loss by the New York Rangers to make the playoffs for the first time since advancing to the Eastern Conference finals in 2009. Erik Cole, Joni Pitkanen, Brandon Sutter and Jussi Jokinen also scored for Carolina.

— Blackhawks 4, Red Wings 2 — In Detroit, Brent Seabrook and Marian Hossa each had a goal and an assist to lift Chicago.

Ben Smith and Brian Campbell also scored for Chicago, which is fighting for a playoff spot a year after winning the Stanley Cup. Patrick Kane had two assists, and Corey Crawford made 26 saves.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.