ShareThis Page
Safety for students on their way to, from bus stop a top priority |

Safety for students on their way to, from bus stop a top priority

| Wednesday, August 21, 2013 7:43 p.m

Kari Lefler and Melissa Harrison keep a close eye on their children every day at the bus stop in Cranberry’s Briar Creek development, but in different ways.

Harrison watches from home as her two oldest children, Matthew, 15, and Anastasia, 13, walk to the bus stop, because it is just across the street. She walks her second youngest child, John, 7, to and from the bus stop.

“There are always so many kids and about 80 to 90 percent of the parents there, but we like to stay with him until the bus gets there to keep him calm,” Harrison said.

Lefler’s oldest child, Colleen, 15, gets driven to and from the bus stop by a neighbor who has a daughter that is the same age, but she drives her younger daughters, Brynn, 8, and Teghin, 7, to and from the bus stop.

“I feel my younger daughters are definitely not old enough to walk on their own, and I want to make sure they’re safe,” Lefler said. “I’m in a panic if I don’t think I can get to the bus stop in time to pick them up.”

But not every parent can take their children to and from the bus stop every day, leaving some children to walk alone.

“If parents are actually unable to walk them to the bus stop, then they should try to work out something with neighbors so that someone may supervise the bus stop or the route to the bus stop,” said Sgt. Chuck Mascellino of Cranberry.

Marcia Ellis, the children and youth program manager at the National Crime Prevention Center, said that parents should also plan a response with their children if approached by a stranger.

“Children need to be aware of their surroundings and what adults are in the area that can help them if they’re faced with a stranger,” Ellis said.

While there were no reported missing children or attempted abductions in Cranberry last year, law enforcement around the country entered nearly 500,000 children in the FBI’s National Crime Information Center database in 2012.

However, only 411 cases were classified as stereotypical abductions – meaning that the abductor was a stranger to the child.

Still, Mascellino said every parent should talk to their children about stranger danger and what to do if a stranger approaches them.

“Someone could say they’ve lost a pet, promise candy or even say their parents wanted them to be picked up, but children should never go with them,” Mascellino said.

Ellis said that parents should also encourage their children to talk about anyone they know that makes them feel uneasy.

“Parents should constantly have conversations with their children, not to scare them, but to let them know they should speak up if someone they know makes them uncomfortable,” Ellis said.

Mascellino said that if approached by a stranger or someone that makes them uneasy, children need to draw attention to themselves.

“Scream, yell, run, whatever children have to do to get someone else’s attention to let them know they’re in danger,” Mascellino said.

If a child is unaccounted for, parents or a child’s caretaker should immediately contact police for assistance.

Shawn Annarelli is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.