ShareThis Page
Salvation Army misses fund-raising goal |

Salvation Army misses fund-raising goal

| Sunday, January 7, 2007 12:00 a.m

The Salvation Army’s Red Kettle Campaign narrowly missed its annual goal this year but collected enough loose change and Internet “cyber kettle” donations to beat last year’s take in western Pennsylvania.

The fund-raising in the 28-county region generated $2.29 million in 2006 — about $25,800 shy of the goal. In 2005, the Salvation Army collected $2.01 million.

“Although we did not reach our anticipated goal, we are delighted that we did better than last year,” said Maj. Robert Reel, commander of the nonprofit’s local division, Downtown, in a statement.

“Western Pennsylvania is amazingly generous,” Reel said. “This outcome is proof positive that the pennies, nickels and dimes truly add up to make a difference.”

The Salvation Army’s cyber kettle raised $50,000 in Internet donations this year.

People can visit to donate to the kettle on the Web. Donors may select which zip code their donations will benefit.

Areas that fell behind in collections this year include: Butler, Butler County; Ellwood City and New Castle, Lawrence County; Rochester, Beaver County; Johnstown, Cambria County; McKeesport and Downtown.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.