ShareThis Page
Sarver man shot in mishap |

Sarver man shot in mishap

BURRELL — A Burrell Township man suffered a non-life threatening injury Monday when a high-powered rifle was accidentally discharged inside his home. The incident was not a hunting-related accident, according to investigators.

Trooper Mike Kapustik said the man, whose identity was being withheld by police, was wounded by the rifle after it accidentally discharged when a juvenile picked up the gun. The incident occurred around noon yesterday.

Officer John Smith of the state Game Commission office near Ligonier said the incident originally came in as a hunting related incident, but after game commission officers began investigating, they felt there could have been more to it than that.

Kapustik said he called in a state police helicopter and investigators from the Pennsylvania Game Commission to comb the area near the Kittanning Township-Burrell Township line yesterday afternoon looking for a hunter who might have been involved in an accidental shooting.

Further investigation revealed it was not a hunting accident, when it was determined that the bullet from the rifle had shattered a nearby window from the inside, the trooper said.

“This was initially reported as a hunting accident,” Kapustik said. “It had nothing to do with hunting.”

The man was flown to a Pittsburgh hospital with injuries Kapustik described as non-life threatening. He said the man had called friends from the hospital yesterday afternoon.

The area where the shooting occurred was a remote farm, surrounded by overgrown fields and woods. The property owner, Renee Zacour of Ford City, has the property posted, meaning it is off-limits to hunters without permission.

Zacour, who arrived at the scene a little more than an hour after it was reported, declined to comment on the incident.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.