Satellite images indicate N. Korea firing up nuke plant for fuel reprocessing |

Satellite images indicate N. Korea firing up nuke plant for fuel reprocessing

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — For the first time in nearly six years, North Korea may be restarting a plant that can reprocess nuclear fuel into weapons-grade plutonium, a U.S. research institute said Wednesday.

The finding is based on analysis of recent commercial satellite imagery at the North’s main Nyongbyon nuclear facility.

The plant is used to reprocess spent fuel from a 5 megawatt reactor that has produced plutonium used for past nuclear test explosions. Last year, to international alarm, North Korea restarted the reactor, which had been shuttered under a 2007 disarmament agreement.

The U.S.-Korea Institute at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies says the reactor appears to have been shut down for about 10 weeks, longer than normal maintenance would require. It is unclear why, but the institute’s best guess is that the North is replacing a small number of spent fuel rods, which may have been defective, and is about to start reprocessing them. That involves separating plutonium from waste products.

Steam coming from buildings associated with the reprocessing plant suggests it is preparing to commence operations, according to the analysis by Nick Hansen, a satellite imagery specialist who closely monitors developments in the North’s weapons programs.

There are also signs of chemical waste outside a fuel fabrication facility, suggesting new fuel rods are being produced to replace the spent ones, he writes.

Joel Wit, a former State Department official who edits the institute’s website, 38 North, which published the findings, said the reprocessing plant last operated in 2009. He said the amount of plutonium that would be harvested from a few spent rods would be small, but it could be a harbinger of a bigger reprocessing effort when more fuel rods inside the reactor are spent.

A Congressional Research Service paper in April 2013 said North Korea is estimated to have enough separated plutonium for at least a half-dozen nuclear weapons. The reactor can produce about one bomb’s worth of plutonium per year, it said.

North Korea also has a uranium enrichment facility at Nyongbyon, likely giving it a second method to produce fissile material for bombs.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.