ShareThis Page
Saturday essay: ‘Casablanca’ moments |

Saturday essay: ‘Casablanca’ moments

| Saturday, March 26, 2011 12:00 a.m

From Wisconsin’s Capitol to the smallest local school district, government’s many agencies are having their “Casablanca” moments in a fashion most farcical.

Just about everyone knows the scene from the 1942 classic movie: In shutting down Rick’s Cafe, the prefect of police is suddenly “shocked” to learn of gambling — just as he’s handed his winnings.

Government apologists, in their best imitation of Capt. Louie Renault, are aghast that public money somehow is much tighter now. In Pennsylvania, the usual suspects, actors all, could use some mustard to go along with their ham.

Exactly when did state universities, county governments, local jurisdictions and all the hand-wringers in between miss the news flash, repeated at regular intervals, that the commonwealth is in the hole for $4 billion• Or that in a governor’s race far from any photo finish, the austerity advocated by Tom Corbett was inevitable?

Neither did this troupe acknowledge the trap, indeed, the pitfall , of the federal stimulus. But no amount of bailout cash could sustain spendthrifts lost in the desert of their own fiscal disregard.

Expect more “Casablanca” moments from all who gamble their future on government’s entangled entitlements.

These days, those who turn to government for its replenishing “waters,” to paraphrase Rick Blaine, are sadly misinformed.

– Bob Pellegrino

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.