ShareThis Page
Saturday essay: Our children’s minds |

Saturday essay: Our children’s minds

| Saturday, June 10, 2006 12:00 a.m

We are doping our kids at unprecedented rates.

Use of psychotropic drugs for children and adolescents has increased fivefold between 1993 and 2002, concludes a Columbia University study published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.

And what a wild card this rearing through pharmacology is.

Now, there can be no doubt that many of these drugs have helped some youngsters turn around wretched and tormented early lives and allowed them to grow into productive adults.

But at what cost?

Ask just about any child and adolescent psychologist how anti-psychotic drugs originally meant for adult brains work in the brains of those far younger and they will not hesitate to tell you they don’t know.

Long-term effects, mental and physical• Same answer, though there are some reports linking some of these drugs to physical ailments.

But the underlying question remains this:

Do these drugs “fix” the physical side of “mental problems” as in, say, better regulating the neurotransmitter serotonin• Or do they merely mask the problem and abandon all hope of children learning to deal with their problems and overcome them naturally — as have many preceding generations of children?

Wrote the Roman poet and satirist Horace in “Carmina,” circa 20 B.C.: “Rule your mind or it will rule you.”

Will some future scribe reflect that we were out of our minds to not allow our children’s minds to work out their challenges?

— Colin McNickle

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.